Letter to the Editor: Small modular nuclear reactors are like unicorns Opinion Property/Sports/Opinion - popup ad by News Of The Area - Modern Media - May 16, 2024 DEAR News Of The Area, Recently (NOTA, 2 May 2024) I asked important questions about the Federal Opposition’s nuclear policy, such as: – Where will they be built? – What type and size of reactors? – What will happen to the tonnes of hazardous, high level radioactive waste generated by nuclear reactors? – What is the risk of radioactive leakages, reactor failures and accidents? So far, I have received no official answers from Liberal or National Party MPs, which begs the question: what are you hiding Mr Dutton and Mr Littleproud? As for small modular nuclear reactors (SMNRs), they are a bit like unicorns: non-existent. The most recent SMNR proposal was a seven module, 462 MW NuScale VOYAGR nuclear project in Utah. After ten years in the development, capital costs ballooned out to US $9.3 billion (AU $14 billion), which equates to US $20,000/kW planned capacity (more than AU$30,000/kW). The NuScale project collapsed and was terminated in November 2023. According to GenCost 2023-24, the NuScale construction costs were much more expensive than renewable energy sources, such as: – rooftop solar panels at AU $1505/kW; – large-scale wind power at AU $5545/kW (fixed) and AU $6856/kW (floating); – Snowy 2.0 pumped hydro at AU $5450/kW. Hopefully fiscal sense will prevail and the Federal Opposition will stop chasing unicorns. Regards, Kenneth HIGGS, Raymond Terrace.