Council plan for Emerald Beach effectively cuts town reserve in two Coffs Coast Coffs Coast News by News Of The Area - Modern Media - August 8, 2021 Emerald Beach residents Steve Walsh and Steve Tucker are angered that Council’s Draft Concept Plan for Emerald Beach Reserve will see the town’s sole reserve dramatically reduced in size. Photo: Emma Darbin. LONGTIME Emerald Beach residents Steve Walsh and Steve Tucker are calling out Coffs Harbour City Council on its ‘poorly designed’ concept plan for the town’s sole National Parks reserve, which they say is misrepresentative to the community. The reserve is part of the Coffs Coast Regional Park and forms a gateway to the Solitary Islands Marine Park, and is jointly managed by Council and the National Parks and Wildlife Service. Advertise with News of The Area today. It’s worth it for your business. Message us. Phone us – (02) 4981 8882. Email us – media@newsofthearea.com.au Locals have been calling on Council and the National Parks and Wildlife Service to help protect the grassed area of the reserve over many years after it became used as an unofficial community car park, overnight camping spot and even a place where locals would undertake repairs on their cars, causing extensive damage to the area. In the last month, the reserve has been bordered off by temporary rock barriers placed there by the National Parks and Wildlife Service to keep cars and caravans off the reserve to prevent it from further damage. After four years of planning, Council has recently released its Draft Concept Plan for Emerald Beach Reserve which includes designated parking bays, seating space, a floating boardwalk, a beach shower, tables and seats, a new playground, a bbq, a new toilet block and an open lawn area. However, Emerald Beach residents Steve Walsh and Steve Tucker say Council’s concept plan effectively cuts the existing grassed reserve area in half. As part of the plan, the main road into Emerald Beach, Fiddaman Road, will be relocated west into the grassed area of the reserve, almost splitting the reserve in two. Mr Walsh said local children play soccer and football on the reserve and that it’s also used annually for the town’s Emerald Beach Fair. “There’s no other grassed areas within 10 to 15kms of here for the kids to hit a cricket ball or play football,” Mr Walsh stressed. “It was an area where the community could gather.” Mr Walsh is calling on Council to show local residents properly designed concept plans for the reserve, which he says he was able to get professionally drawn up in just one day. “It was something that a 2 year old would have done a better job of,” Mr Walsh said of Council’s concept plan. “And you’re expected to make a decision based on that.” Both men fear that after four years of community campaigning to get the community reserve area upgraded, locals will just accept Council’s plans for the reserve area. “What you see is not what you’re getting, it doesn’t represent what they are doing,” the men stated. “You get four weeks after four years to comment on this plan; you can’t expect people to make proper decisions. “They’re trying to rush this plan through.” Mr Walsh is urging the local community to look at his professionally designed concept plan of what Council has planned for the reserve area. “It needs to be presented to the people properly, I just want to tell the people what’s going on,” Mr Walsh said. “The big question is do you want a reserve that is totally unusable.” A Council spokesperson said Council had sent out three updates to local residents during the public exhibition of the Emerald Beach Draft Concept Plan and that Council had responded to any queries about the plan to provide residents with further clarity on it. Mr Walsh and Mr Tucker said they were also under the impression that Council was going to present more than one plan for the community to decide on, and they said Council never offered an option of leaving the reserve “as is”. “There has never been an option of leaving it as is and doing it up,” Mr Walsh said. “I’m 100% in favour of doing what the residents want and leaving it.” “There’s nothing wrong with leaving it as it is; now they’re cutting it in half.” A Council spokesperson said the decision to produce one concept plan was endorsed at a community meeting on 22 October 2019 and that this had been communicated to the broader community via progress updates on the project. Public submissions on the Emerald Beach Reserve Draft Concept Plan close at 5pm today (Friday 6 August) and can be made on Council’s Have Your Say page on its website at https://haveyoursay.coffsharbour.nsw.gov.au/emerald-beach. By Emma DARBIN Steve Walsh hopes his professionally drawn up plan will help highlight to Emerald Beach residents proposed changes Council intends to make to the town’s reserve.
This article has a serious omission. The key point being that the two individuals cited in this article both own land directly on the reserve property in question. Their motives are obvious and their views do not represent the majority opinion at Emerald Beach. Most people I’ve talked to are all for pushing the road as far west as possible to maximize the green space between the road and the beach. The land is rarely used for anything other than overflow parking. For the most part, I think the council has come up with a fairly good plan this time that makes most of the people happy. Reply
Unfortunately Mr Walsh considers restricting visitors to the beach and park acceptable by limiting access and parking spaces. As all residence know this popular ocean front attracts in excess of 80 vehicles on any given, nice day. The truth being that both Mr Walsh and Mr Tucker who both live directly adjacent to the park land want nothing more than to have no thoroughfare at the beach front at all. This for their benefit only. See this for what it is – discrimination for the wider publics access and these two’s self indulgence. The councils draft plan is well thought out and provides beautification, improved access, improved ammenities and a space for all to enjoy. The only criticism is that more parking spaces will need consideration. Reply